Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 49, 2023 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36721161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While coronary artery bypass grafting is typically considered first choice for the treatment of left main stenosis, there is a trend towards left main stenting due to a steadily aging population in western countries with a high operative risk and patients with single vessel coronary artery disease affecting the left main artery. Nevertheless left main stenting remains controversial, especially in patients with concomitant indications for open-heart surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: We want to present a case of a 78-year-old male patient with high-grade aortic stenosis who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement at our heart center due to anatomical contraindications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Stenting of the left main coronary artery was performed three years earlier due to single vessel coronary artery disease while moderate aortic valve stenosis was under surveillance at the time of the intervention. Intraoperatively we found the stent to be deformed inside the left main coronary artery, covering nearly 25% of the coronary ostium. So injection of cardioplegia directly into this ostium, as we perform normally, was not possible without further damaging the stent and/or the opening of the ostium. We had to insert cardioplegia via the retrograde way, so via the coronary sinus. CONCLUSION: While left main stenting can be reasonable for a specific population of patients, it should be used cautiously in patients with concomitant indications for open-heart surgery in the near future and a low perioperative risk profile.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia
2.
Eur Surg Res ; 63(2): 98-104, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852340

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Starting a minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for mitral valve repair (MVR) program is challenging as it requires a new learning curve, but compromising surgical results at the same time is not acceptable. Here, we describe our surgical educational experience of starting a new MICS program at a university heart center in Germany. METHODS: A dedicated team for the new MICS program including 2 cardiac surgeons, 1 cardiac anesthetist, 1 perfusionist, and 1 scrub nurse was chosen. The use of long shafted instruments was trained in a low-cost self-assembled MICS simulator, and the EACTS endoscopic dry lab course was visited. Thereafter, 1 MICS center was visited for direct observation and peer-to-peer education for 6 weeks. The mentor observed the first 10 cases performed by the mentee. The surgical mitral valve expertise of 1 single cardiac surgeon was retrospectively analyzed between April 2016 and April 2021. RESULTS: Before the implementation of the MICS-MVR program, 18 mitral valve operations have been performed through sternotomy between April 2016 and October 2018 including 12 replacements and 6 ring annuloplasties. After starting the MICS-MVR program, 73 mitral operations have been performed by the same surgeon of which 53 video-assisted through minithoracotomy (72.6%). 83.1% of the MICS procedures included complex repair (n = 38) and ring annuloplasty (n = 6). Open heart MV surgery was necessary in 20 patients due to concomitant procedures (n = 8), redo procedures (n = 2), severe endocarditis (n = 4), or contraindication for MICS such as PAD (n = 6). There have been no deaths, 1 stroke, and 1 cardiac vascular (RCX) complication. Two patients required conversion to sternotomy and one pericardiocentesis in the long term. CONCLUSION: Typically, excellent exposure and high repair rates of the MV has led us offer MICS approach to a majority of patients with isolated MV disease. Careful planning and a strict mentor-mentee concept facilitated a safe startup of an MICS program in a busy university heart center.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/educação , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Mentores , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Transplantation ; 106(6): 1243-1252, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560698

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a risk factor for the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and is associated with reduced long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). The aim of this International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Transplant Registry study was to compare posttransplant survival in different CMV donor:recipient serologic combinations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry, on 15 885 adult primary heart transplant recipients with known CMV serologic status between July 2004 and June 2014. Posttransplant survival and risk of developing CAV were compared across 4 groups: CMV-seronegative recipients (R-) receiving CMV-positive grafts (D+), intermediate-risk patients (D+R+ and D-R+), and low-risk patients (D-R-). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (donor/recipient age, body mass index, recipient serum creatinine, blood group, donor cause of death, recipient diagnosis, and ischemic time) were mostly balanced between the groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses over a follow-up of 10 y revealed significantly worse survival for both D+ groups as compared to the CMV low-risk group (D+R+: 56.61% [95% confidence interval, 53.94-59.41] versus D-R-: 63.09% [59.74-66.64] P < 0.01 and D+R-: 57.69% [56.03-59.39] versus D-R-; P < 0.001), whereas recipient seropositivity alone was not associated with reduced survival (D-R+ versus D-R-P = 0.178). The risk of developing CAV after HTx was not significantly increased in D+ as compared to D- groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a large contemporary cohort, CMV status at the time of HTx was not associated with CAV development. However, there was a significant association between donor CMV seropositivity and reduced short- and long-term survival after HTx. Approaches to mitigate the impact of CMV on posttransplant survival are needed.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Cardiopatias , Transplante de Coração , Adulto , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Citomegalovirus , Cardiopatias/etiologia , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep ; 10(1): e61-e63, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34966639

RESUMO

Mitral valve fibroelastoma is a rare condition that can be associated with high morbidity rates due to thrombus formation and resulting embolic events. Causative treatment for affected patients is mitral valve surgery. An association between cardiac fibroelastoma and desmoid-type fibromatosis, an aggressive form of fibromatosis, is not yet described. We present a case of a 58-year-old man with a history of desmoid-type fibromatosis and concomitant papillary fibroelastoma of the mitral valve who consequently underwent mitral valve replacement.

5.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep ; 10(1): e18-e21, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717827

RESUMO

Background Marfan's syndrome (MFS) is a connective tissue disorder, caused by a mutation in the FBN-1 gene and affecting multiple organ systems including the vascular system. During pregnancy, women with MFS have an increased risk of aortic dissection due to changes in the cardiovascular system. Case Description We present a 39-year-old woman that suffered from an acute aortic dissection in week 33 of her third pregnancy who urgently required lifesaving surgery. Three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scan was performed with unborn child in utero. Conclusion Monitoring of patients with suspected or confirmed MFS appears essential and interdisciplinary treatment and prevention strategies are required.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...